[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15054661#comment-15054661
]
Avinash Sridharan edited comment on MESOS-4114 at 12/12/15 9:59 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[~sargun] , [~tknaup] so what is the final consensus on this ? Should we have a
"vip" field in DiscoveryInfo and Port will have a localPort/instancePort field
associated with it ? Can we close the requirements on this?
was (Author: [email protected]):
[~sargun] , [~tknaup] so what is the final consensus on this ? Should have a
"vip" field in DiscoveryInfo and Port will have a localPort/instancePort field
associated with it ? Can we close the requirements on this?
> Add field VIP to message Port
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-4114
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4114
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Sargun Dhillon
> Assignee: Avinash Sridharan
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: mesosphere
>
> We would like to extend the Mesos protocol buffer 'Port' to include an
> optional repeated string named "VIP" - to map it to a well known virtual IP,
> or virtual hostname for discovery purposes.
> We also want this field exposed in DiscoveryInfo in state.json.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
