[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15417455#comment-15417455
 ] 

Guangya Liu commented on MESOS-970:
-----------------------------------

Actually, [~bmahler] already mentioned this in a JIRA here 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4558 and we do have plan to fix 
this.
 
I think this was introduced by the review here 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49784/ as we are adding more test cases here for 
allocator benchmark test.
 
{code}
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(
    SlaveAndFrameworkCount,
    HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test,
    ::testing::Combine(
      ::testing::Values(1000U, 5000U, 10000U, 20000U, 30000U, 50000U),
      ::testing::Values(1U, 50U, 100U, 200U, 500U, 1000U, 3000U, 6000U))
    );
{code}
 
There will be 48 (6 * 8) cases here and the longest benchmark test would have 
50000 agents and 6000 frameworks as the test parameter, and also some test is 
looping (framework * 2) times and for the last case, it would be 12000 loops, 
that's why you see the benchmark test time is increasing.
 
We are now trying to find a solution for this so that we can also enable the 
benchmark test in ASF CI. For now, perhaps you can use some filter to filter 
out some test cases.
 
{code}
MESOS_BENCHMARK=1 GTEST_FILTER="*BENCHMARK*.*/1" make check
{code}
 
The above command will only run the first test case, you can adjust the 
parameter based on your test requirement. Hope this helps.

> Upgrade bundled leveldb to 1.18
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-970
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-970
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: replicated log
>            Reporter: Benjamin Mahler
>            Assignee: Tomasz Janiszewski
>
> We currently bundle leveldb 1.4, and the latest version is leveldb 1.18.
> Upgrade to 1.18 could solve the problems when build Mesos in some non-x86 
> architecture CPU.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to