[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15419523#comment-15419523
 ] 

Greg Mann commented on MESOS-2211:
----------------------------------

This just came up in a review, so I'm adding my comments here. I would propose 
one of the following 3 approaches, in my personal order of preference:

* Use both {{#define}} guards _and_ {{#pragma once}}. This gives us the best of 
both worlds, with little effort.
* Use {{#pragma once}} since it's widely supported. As [~karya] suggested, we 
could amend our style guide to accommodate this.
* Use {{#define}} guards which contain the full path in the guard. Verbosity in 
include guards is not something that I'm worried about, and this provides a 
dead simple way to ensure a unique name for every guard.

> Include guard naming fixup
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-2211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2211
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Till Toenshoff
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: mesosphere
>
> Triggered by a comment in a review request, I noticed that we currently have 
> no consistent style for naming include guards.
> Examples: 
> include/mesos/resources.hpp: {{#define __RESOURCES_HPP__}}
> include/mesos/executor.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_EXECUTOR_HPP__}}
> include/mesos/mesos.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_HPP__}}
> I think the **right** way would be stating the path and include file name 
> within the guard, so the above at fault become:
> include/mesos/resources.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_RESOURCES_HPP__}}
> include/mesos/mesos.hpp: {{#define __MESOS_MESOS_HPP__}}
> Everything from include/XXX should have a __XXX_ prefix in its guard name, 
> anything from src/XXX should have a __XXX_ prefix. This should also apply to 
> multiple folder levels; e.g. include/XXX/YYY/FOO should have a __XXX_YYY_FOO 
> prefix.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to