[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vinod Kone updated MESOS-6299:
------------------------------
    Description: 
In `Master::_accept()` there are cases when a task is not launched (e.g, agent 
disconnected, agent removed or task group is invalid). Doesn't look like we 
make sure the task is removed from `framework->pending` in this case. In 
addition to the memory leak reconciliation will result in a scheduler thinking 
the task is still in TASK_STAGING. Same for operators who are looking at 
operator endpoints.

Note that pending task not being removed when agent is disconnected/removed is 
a long standing bug. We should fix it in all the supported versions.




  was:In `Master::_accept()` there are cases when a task is not launched (e.g, 
agent disconnected or task is invalid). Doesn't look like we make sure the task 
is removed from `framework->pending` in this case.


> Master doesn't remove task from pending when it is invalid
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-6299
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6299
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vinod Kone
>            Assignee: Vinod Kone
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: mesosphere
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> In `Master::_accept()` there are cases when a task is not launched (e.g, 
> agent disconnected, agent removed or task group is invalid). Doesn't look 
> like we make sure the task is removed from `framework->pending` in this case. 
> In addition to the memory leak reconciliation will result in a scheduler 
> thinking the task is still in TASK_STAGING. Same for operators who are 
> looking at operator endpoints.
> Note that pending task not being removed when agent is disconnected/removed 
> is a long standing bug. We should fix it in all the supported versions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to