[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16241612#comment-16241612
 ] 

Yan Xu commented on MESOS-8160:
-------------------------------

/cc [~adam-mesos] this is relevant to the point you made on MESOS-1719 "in 
DC/OS we'd like to be able to ensure unique framework names and not just 
frameworkIDs".

> Support idempotent framework registration
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-8160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8160
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Yan Xu
>
> Right now when a framework registers/subscribes, the master assigns a 
> framework ID to it and send it back so the framework can use it to tear 
> itself down on Mesos when it's done. However if the framework fails to 
> receive it (e.g., it fails over before it receives the ID), it doesn't have a 
> way to do the teardown or failover.
> One apparent solution would be to allow the frameworks to supply the 
> framework IDs themselves but it may be easier for backwards compatibility to 
> come up with a new framework supplied "unique name/handle" concept to allow 
> the framework to identify itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to