[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349016#comment-16349016
]
Andrew Schwartzmeyer commented on MESOS-8519:
---------------------------------------------
Got this working. Apparently, Windows does not care if processes in a job
object are still alive; if the handles to that job object are closed, it
deletes the object. You'd think it'd count each process in the job object as a
reference so it didn't inadvertently delete an in-use job object. The fix is to
make the mesos-containerizer open and hold a handle to its job object, which
keeps alive and findable again by the agent.
> Fix recovery of job object isolated tasks
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-8519
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8519
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Choose from below ...
> Components: agent
> Environment: Windows 10 Client 16299.192
> Reporter: Andrew Schwartzmeyer
> Assignee: Andrew Schwartzmeyer
> Priority: Major
> Labels: windows
>
> While the chain starting at https://reviews.apache.org/r/65397/ fixes many of
> the bugs leading up to the enabling of agent recovery on Windows (and indeed,
> enables it fully for Docker tasks), it explicitly does not yet enable the
> recovery of tasks contained in a job object.
> This JIRA issues specifically covers the bug where the agent fails to find an
> existing job object contained task, because it cannot find the job object
> when its back up. The task still exists, and when first launched, is named
> appropriately, and that name is checkpointed correctly and used by the
> recovering agent to find it again, but it fails because the job object the
> task is in has "lost" it's name.
> Inspecting it in process explorer, I verified the container process initially
> is in the correctly named job object, but after the parent process (the
> initial mesos agent) dies, while the container is still running, process
> explorer reports "Access Denied" for the job object name.
> My hypothesis is that this is related to the kernel object namespace
> mechanism. Currently researching.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)