[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16530058#comment-16530058
]
Kirill Plyashkevich commented on MESOS-9031:
--------------------------------------------
[~qianzhang], services are part of marathon's pod and get their ports mapped
properly (port mapping is enabled).
communication with external nodes on other agents and launched in host network
is ok.
the problem is only for services using port-maping on the same bridge network
`mesos-cni0`.
more I'm thinking about it, more it looks like a problem in
`mesos-cni-port-mapper`.
if you take a look at [cni
portmap|https://github.com/containernetworking/plugins/tree/master/plugins/meta/portmap],
it does MASQUARADE/SNAT on its own. so regardless of rules set by `bridge`
plugin traffic still gets masqueraded, which is exactly what needed.
> Mesos CNI portmap plugins' iptables rules doesn't allow connections via host
> ip and port from the same bridge container network
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-9031
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9031
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cni, containerization
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Kirill Plyashkevich
> Priority: Major
>
> using `mesos-cni-port-mapper` with folllowing config:
> {noformat}
> {
> "name" : "dcos",
> "type" : "mesos-cni-port-mapper",
> "excludeDevices" : [],
> "chain": "MESOS-CNI0-PORT-MAPPER",
> "delegate": {
> "type": "bridge",
> "bridge": "mesos-cni0",
> "isGateway": true,
> "ipMasq": true,
> "hairpinMode": true,
> "ipam": {
> "type": "host-local",
> "ranges": [
> [{"subnet": "172.26.0.0/16"}]
> ],
> "routes": [
> {"dst": "0.0.0.0/0"}
> ]
> }
> }
> }
> {noformat}
> - 2 services running on the same mesos-slave using unified containerizer in
> different tasks and communicating via host ip and host port
> - connection timeouts due to iptables rules per container CNI-XXX chain
> - actually timeouts are caused by
> {noformat}
> Chain CNI-XXX (1 references)
> num target prot opt source destination
> 1 ACCEPT all -- anywhere 172.26.0.0/16 /* name:
> "dcos" id: "YYYY" */
> 2 MASQUERADE all -- anywhere !base-address.mcast.net/4 /*
> name: "dcos" id: "YYYY" */
> {noformat}
> rule #1 is executed and no masquerading happens.
> there are multiple solutions:
> - simpliest and fastest one is not to add that ACCEPT
> - perhaps, there's a better change in iptables rules that can fix it
> - proper one (imho) is to finally implement cni spec 0.3.x in order to be
> able to use chaining of plugins and use cni's `bridge` and `portmap` plugins
> in chain (and get rid of mesos-cni-port-mapper completely eventually).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
