Andrei Budnik created MESOS-9116:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Flaky processes within POD cause failures of launch 
nested container due to a bug in `mnt` namespace detection.
                 Key: MESOS-9116
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9116
             Project: Mesos
          Issue Type: Task
          Components: agent, containerization
            Reporter: Andrei Budnik


Launch nested container call might fail with the following error:
{code:java}
Failed to enter mount namespace: Failed to open '/proc/29473/ns/mnt': No such 
file or directory
{code}
This happens when the containerizer launcher [tries to 
enter|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/077f122d52671412a2ab5d992d535712cc154002/src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp#L879-L892]
 `mnt` namespace using the pid of a terminated process. The pid [was 
detected|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/077f122d52671412a2ab5d992d535712cc154002/src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp#L1930-L1958]
 by the agent before spawning the containerizer launcher process because the 
process was still running.

The flaky process within the POD can end up in D-state (unkillable). This 
process can be a child of a nested container process, so the agent doesn't know 
about it. Killing the nested container process doesn't mean that all its child 
processes, which stuck in D-state, are killed.

For example, the nested container can be a custom executor which spawns its own 
tasks which might end up in D-state. Another example is when the containerizer 
launcher 
[spawns|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/077f122d52671412a2ab5d992d535712cc154002/src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp#L755-L768]
 shell scripts like `mount` during its initialization.

In that case, the agent might detect a process which should be already 
terminated, but it still exists because it's in D-state. At the moment when the 
containerizer launcher is spawned, the stuck process might disappear, so we get 
the error.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to