[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15979908#comment-15979908
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-857:
---------------------------------------

Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/543#discussion_r112808990
  
    --- Diff: metron-deployment/packaging/docker/ansible-docker/Dockerfile ---
    @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ RUN yum install -y tar
     RUN yum install -y wget
     RUN yum groupinstall -y "Development tools"
     RUN yum install -y zlib-dev openssl-devel sqlite-devel bzip2-devel 
libffi-devel
    -RUN wget https://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.10/Python-2.7.10.tgz -O 
/usr/src/Python-2.7.10.tgz
    +RUN wget https://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.12/Python-2.7.12.tgz -O 
/usr/src/Python-2.7.12.tgz
    --- End diff --
    
    Sure, let me 2x check that


> Metron should one unified docker build image
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-857
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-857
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Otto Fowler
>            Assignee: Otto Fowler
>
> Right now, we have a docker environment for building the code of the product, 
> and a docker image for building rpms.
> If you are in an environment that requires the first, you cannot use the 
> second from there.
> We should have a merged, unified metron build environment that builds the 
> whole product.
> This will enable workflows such as: 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Metron+Installation+on+an+Ambari-Managed+Cluster
> That page can be updated once this is complete as well
> The approach:
> Using maven profiles and profile activation it is possible to have two 
> versions of the exec call to build rpms, one that calls docker and one that 
> just calls the script.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to