[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16141653#comment-16141653
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1122:
----------------------------------------

Github user nickwallen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/709#discussion_r135264143
  
    --- Diff: 
metron-deployment/packaging/ambari/metron-mpack/src/main/resources/common-services/METRON/CURRENT/package/scripts/params/params_linux.py
 ---
    @@ -251,6 +253,26 @@
     threat_intel_join_parallelism = 
config['configurations']['metron-enrichment-env']['threat_intel_join_parallelism']
     kafka_writer_parallelism = 
config['configurations']['metron-enrichment-env']['kafka_writer_parallelism']
     
    +# Profiler
    +
    +metron_profiler_topology = 'profiler'
    +profiler_input_topic = 
config['configurations']['metron-enrichment-env']['enrichment_output_topic']
    --- End diff --
    
    Its a good thing to bring up and discuss @merrimanr .  I agree with 
@cestella .  Doing it this way makes it less error-prone for the user.  If the 
user changes the enrichment output topic, the Profiler will get auto-magically 
updated too.  
    
    I cannot think of a use case where the Profiler does not want the output of 
Enrichment.


> Add support for the profiler in the management pack
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-1122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1122
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Casey Stella
>
> The Profiler should be installed via the management pack.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to