[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Foley updated METRON-1163:
-------------------------------
Description:
When the maven-rat-plugin runs against metron-alerts component, it has:
bq. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.12:check
(default) on project metron-alerts: Too many files with unapproved license: 2
See RAT report in: .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/target/rat.txt
In the report file it says:
Files with unapproved licenses:
* .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/3rdpartylicenses.txt
*
.../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css
The file "3rdpartylicenses.txt" is an empty (0-length) file. Should it be?
The styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css file is a complex file referencing
* Font Awesome 4.7.0 by @davegandy - http://fontawesome.io - @fontawesome
* License - http://fontawesome.io/license (Font: SIL OFL 1.1, CSS: MIT
License)
which in turn says:
* all CSS files License: MIT License (Apache Category A)
* Font License: SIL OFL 1.1 (Apache Category B)
* Documentation License: CC BY 3.0 (Apache Category B)
Both of these files are downloaded during build (they're not in the Metron
repository), but we're still responsible for the licensing. Suggestions for
passing RAT test? If the suggestion is to exclude these files, please provide
justification.
was:
When the maven-rat-plugin runs against metron-alerts component, it has:
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.12:check
(default) on project metron-alerts: Too many files with unapproved license: 2
See RAT report in: .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/target/rat.txt
```
In the report file it says:
Files with unapproved licenses:
* .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/3rdpartylicenses.txt
*
.../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css
The file "3rdpartylicenses.txt" is an empty (0-length) file. Should it be?
The styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css file is a complex file referencing
* Font Awesome 4.7.0 by @davegandy - http://fontawesome.io - @fontawesome
* License - http://fontawesome.io/license (Font: SIL OFL 1.1, CSS: MIT
License)
which in turn says:
* all CSS files License: MIT License (Apache Category A)
* Font License: SIL OFL 1.1 (Apache Category B)
* Documentation License: CC BY 3.0 (Apache Category B)
Both of these files are downloaded during build (they're not in the Metron
repository), but we're still responsible for the licensing. Suggestions for
passing RAT test? If the suggestion is to exclude these files, please provide
justification.
> RAT failures for metron-interface/metron-alerts
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: METRON-1163
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1163
> Project: Metron
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.4.1
> Reporter: Matt Foley
> Priority: Blocker
>
> When the maven-rat-plugin runs against metron-alerts component, it has:
> bq. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.12:check (default) on project
> metron-alerts: Too many files with unapproved license: 2 See RAT report in:
> .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/target/rat.txt
> In the report file it says:
> Files with unapproved licenses:
> * .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/3rdpartylicenses.txt
> *
> .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css
> The file "3rdpartylicenses.txt" is an empty (0-length) file. Should it be?
> The styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css file is a complex file referencing
> * Font Awesome 4.7.0 by @davegandy - http://fontawesome.io - @fontawesome
> * License - http://fontawesome.io/license (Font: SIL OFL 1.1, CSS: MIT
> License)
> which in turn says:
> * all CSS files License: MIT License (Apache Category A)
> * Font License: SIL OFL 1.1 (Apache Category B)
> * Documentation License: CC BY 3.0 (Apache Category B)
> Both of these files are downloaded during build (they're not in the Metron
> repository), but we're still responsible for the licensing. Suggestions for
> passing RAT test? If the suggestion is to exclude these files, please
> provide justification.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
