Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
    It seems this PR is meant to address the global case, since the writer is 
general purpose. Per @cestella's comments, I don't know that we can include 
original_string. I do think there's value in minimally ensuring the timestamp 
and source.type fields are validated in the near term. It seems that addressing 
a broader validation strategy might be in order, but maybe we could handle that 
separately as a compromise? Thoughts @ottobackwards?


Reply via email to