Github user ruffle1986 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1219#discussion_r223676139
  
    --- Diff: metron-interface/metron-alerts/package.json ---
    @@ -22,17 +22,17 @@
         "@angular/platform-browser": "^6.1.6",
         "@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "^6.1.6",
         "@angular/router": "^6.1.6",
    +    "@ruffle1986/pikaday-time": "^1.6.1",
         "@types/bootstrap": "^4.1.1",
         "@types/jquery": "^3.3.4",
         "ace-builds": "^1.2.6",
         "ajv": "^6.5.1",
         "angular-confirmation-popover": "^4.2.0",
         "bootstrap": "4.0.0-alpha.6",
         "core-js": "^2.4.1",
    +    "date-fns": "^1.29.0",
         "font-awesome": "^4.7.0",
    -    "moment": "^2.22.2",
         "ng2-dragula": "^1.5.0",
    -    "pikaday-time": "^1.6.1",
    --- End diff --
    
    > A, simply remove the time picker component
    
    If it's not important to let the user choose a time beside the date, then 
yes, we can get rid of `pikaday-time` and just use `pikaday`. Unfortunately 
there's a **but** here. :(
    In order to eliminate moment, we still have to fork pikaday. Here's why:
    
    [This](https://github.com/dbushell/Pikaday/pull/721) is a PR against 
Pikaday's master about removing moment.js from the dependencies. It's already 
merged but as it turned out, it's not published yet on npm. If you install the 
latest pikaday from npm, you will get moment as well. :( It's very difficult to 
follow and chaotic. This is a good example of choosing a 3rd party without 
proper investigation. And this is also the dangerous part of relying on 3rd 
party open source modules.
    
    [Here's](https://github.com/dbushell/Pikaday/issues/805) an issue to push 
it, but no answers since 6th of September
    
    > B, add a separate one that isn't part of pikaday
    
    This would be the best imho because of the chaotic nature of pikaday. But 
it's hard to find a solution out there I could confidently rely on. The modules 
I trust are the [bootstrap 
datepicker](https://ng-bootstrap.github.io/#/components/datepicker/overview) or 
the [one by material 
design](https://material.angular.io/components/datepicker/overview). But I have 
my concerns about these. These are new dependencies and it has to be discussed 
which one should be picked. Also, introducing a datepicker by angular material 
would be weird imho, since it's very different from our current design and it 
wouldn't feel like a cohesive whole. But I'm not in the position to decide.
    
    C, simply bring the relevant code into Metron so that if we need to 
maintain it or make changes we can feely do so?
    
    This is why I've forked pikaday-time
    
     


---

Reply via email to