[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16671627#comment-16671627
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1815:
----------------------------------------

Github user justinleet commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1249
  
    @ottobackwards I'm not sure what you mean by ingest here?  In my head 
"ingest" is just getting data into Kafka before the parsers (and really Metron 
as a whole) is involved. Could you expand a bit on what you would want each of 
those projects to actually contain?
    
    I'm not opposed to organizing things a bit differently, to avoid exploding 
things out too much if we add other platforms (especially since it's really not 
hard to adjust this PR as needed), but I would have expected something more like
    ```
    .
    └── metron-parsers
        ├── metron-parsers-common
        └── metron-parsers-storm
    ```


> Separate metron-parsers into metron-parsers-common and metron-parsers-storm
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-1815
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1815
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Justin Leet
>            Assignee: Justin Leet
>            Priority: Major
>
> In order to expose our parsers to 3rd party components (e.g. the discussions 
> on NiFi and potentially other platforms like Spark), we should
> separate the storm-bits into its own project. The metron-parsers-common
> project should contain only parser-oriented code, whereas the
> metron-parsers-storm project should contain the storm specific code
> (e.g. the parser bolt).
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to