Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1249
Following along here. I'm in agreement with @ottobackwards's point about
not having to depend on the module that contains all the parsers that ship with
Metron. So having a separate `metron-parsers` and `metron-parsers-common`
makes sense to me.
I'm not understanding what would go in `metron-parsing-common` though.
Maybe @ottobackwards is correct and there is shared code between storm/spark.
But wouldn't that belong in `metron-parsers`? I feel like the right approach
will come into focus after we take an initial pass at splitting things up. I
propose we start with:
```
âââ metron-parsing
âââ metron-parsers
âââ metron-parsers-common
âââ metron-parsing-storm
```
---