[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704089#comment-16704089
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1889:
----------------------------------------
GitHub user mmiklavc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1286
METRON-1889: Add any missing timestamp fields to unified enrichment topology
## Contributor Comments
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1889
This is done in reference to this discussion on the mailing list wrt
deprecating the split join topology.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e3a0f5634db74d44c4e2f2e0399cc3f0777f1e0dce2e1f764cc0a39f@%3Cdev.metron.apache.org%3E
The split-join enrichment topology has the following timestamp keys:
**Adapter timestamps**
```
"adapter:hostfromjsonlistadapter:begin:ts": "1542840777691",
"adapter:hostfromjsonlistadapter:end:ts": "1542840777691",
"adapter:threatinteladapter:begin:ts": "1542840784545",
"adapter:threatinteladapter:end:ts": "1542840784545",
"adapter:geoadapter:begin:ts": "1542840783196",
"adapter:geoadapter:end:ts": "1542840783196"
```
**Split and Join Bolt timestamps**
```
"enrichmentsplitterbolt:splitter:begin:ts": "1542840777617",
"enrichmentsplitterbolt:splitter:end:ts": "1542840777617",
"enrichmentjoinbolt:joiner:ts": "1542840783234",
"threatintelsplitterbolt:splitter:begin:ts": "1542840783247",
"threatintelsplitterbolt:splitter:end:ts": "1542840783247",
"threatinteljoinbolt:joiner:ts": "1542840784555"
```
The unified enrichment topology currently only has the following timestamp
keys:
```
"parallelenricher:splitter:begin:ts": "1542807098066",
"parallelenricher:splitter:end:ts": "1542807098066",
"parallelenricher:enrich:begin:ts": "1542807098066"
```
The enrichment end timestamp is missing in the case when there are no
enrichments. Also, the adapter timestamps did not carry over from the
split-join topology.
In this PR, I've corrected for the missing `enrich:end:ts` case for when
there are no enrichments and added back in the adapter timestamps.
This is the new timestamp output for the unified enrichment topology after
my changes:
**Adapter timestamps**
```
"adapter:geoadapter:begin:ts": "1542882553866",
"adapter:geoadapter:end:ts": "1542882553866",
"adapter:threatinteladapter:begin:ts": "1542882553869",
"adapter:threatinteladapter:end:ts": "1542882553870",
"adapter:hostfromjsonlistadapter:begin:ts": "1542882553866",
"adapter:hostfromjsonlistadapter:end:ts": "1542882553866"
```
**Enrichment bolt timestamps**
```
"parallelenricher:enrich:begin:ts": "1542882553869",
"parallelenricher:enrich:end:ts": "1542882553870",
"parallelenricher:splitter:begin:ts": "1542882553869",
"parallelenricher:splitter:end:ts": "1542882553869"
```
**Testing**
Spin up full dev and you should see bro records in Elasticsearch (or Solr)
that now contain the adapter timestamps. By default, the unified enrichment
topology should be running, but make sure of this when you evaluate the records
in the bro index.
## Pull Request Checklist
### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to
be created at [Metron
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-"
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target
branch (typically master)?
### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is
being changed or addressed?
- [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified
and tested manually?
- [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been
executed in the root metron folder via:
```
mvn -q clean integration-test install &&
dev-utilities/build-utils/verify_licenses.sh
```
- [x] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to
verify your changes?
- n/a If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [x] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?
### For documentation related changes:
- n/a Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in
which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run
the following commands and the verify changes via
`site-book/target/site/index.html`:
```
cd site-book
mvn site
```
#### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up
for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before
submitting a pull request.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mmiklavc/metron METRON-1889
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1286.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1286
----
commit e118cfbee2e044d0e7c9ef92d79f13158883b755
Author: Michael Miklavcic <michael.miklavcic@...>
Date: 2018-11-30T00:42:25Z
Add adapter timestamp properties to unified enrichment topology parallel
enricher
----
> Add any missing timestamp fields to unified enrichment topology
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: METRON-1889
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1889
> Project: Metron
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael Miklavcic
> Assignee: Michael Miklavcic
> Priority: Major
>
> The split-join topology has a number of timestamp fields customers are using
> that might not exist in the unified topology, e.g. threat intel bolt
> timestamp. This ticket should be to compare the 2 topologies and replicate
> any potentially missing, and still-relevant, timestamps to the unified
> enrichment topology.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)