[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15824608#comment-15824608
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-659:
---------------------------------------

Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/417
  
    @nickwallen Nice contribution! The docs are solid, and I like the 
configurability of the batch size and frequency. And the quicker deploy time is 
definitely a plus. Is that because we're no longer deploying the sensors by 
default? I'm on the fence about how we should handle that. I originally thought 
it best to deploy and not start the real sensors. But if we're saving 14 
minutes in the Vagrant deployment, I could be convinced otherwise. And the more 
I think about it, you could just run the Ansible role for the sensors which is 
easy enough. I don't really have any other suggested changes besides the minor 
remark above about the default of 100 vs 1000.
    +1 from me pending the Travis checks.


> Emulate Sensors in Development Environments
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-659
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-659
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Nick Allen
>            Assignee: Nick Allen
>             Fix For: Next + 1
>
>
> Replace the Snort, Bro, and YAF sensors on the "Quick Dev" and "Full Dev" 
> environments with a mechanism that consumes less resources.
> These environments are notoriously difficult to work with because the 
> installed services consume nearly all available memory.  The Bro, YAF, and 
> Snort sensors, along with the PCAP Replay service, consume a considerable 
> amount of these limited resources.  
> Replacing these sensors with a lightweight mechanism should free-up 
> additional resources, make the environment easier to work with, and result in 
> faster deployments.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to