[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15419427#comment-15419427
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2553:
--------------------------------------

Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/843
  
    @bbende  ran several tests on 3 node HDFS cluster doing file movement from 
and to HDFS. Forced EL syntax errors on all changed processors and they 
reported as expected. Please let me let me know about comments provided above, 
otherwise all looks good.


> HDFS processors throwing exception from OnSchedule when directory is an 
> invalid URI
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-2553
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2553
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.7.0
>            Reporter: Bryan Bende
>            Assignee: Bryan Bende
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> If you enter a directory string that results in an invalid URI, the HDFS 
> processors will throw an unexpected exception from OnScheduled because of a 
> logging statement on in AbstractHadoopProcessor:
> {code}
> getLogger().info("Initialized a new HDFS File System with working dir: {} 
> default block size: {} default replication: {} config: {}",
>                     new Object[] { fs.getWorkingDirectory(), 
> fs.getDefaultBlockSize(new Path(dir)), fs.getDefaultReplication(new 
> Path(dir)), config.toString() });
> {code}
> An example input for the directory that can produce this problem:
> data_${literal('testing'):substring(0,4)%7D
> In addition to this, FetchHDFS, ListHDFS, GetHDFS, and PutHDFS all create new 
> Path instances in their onTrigger methods from the same directory, outside of 
> a try/catch which would result in throwing a ProcessException (if it got past 
> the logging issue above).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to