[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15420608#comment-15420608
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-1831:
--------------------------------------
Github user joewitt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/834
The new dependency in NiFiProperties definitely starts to increase it's
weight from a dependency/transitive perspective. We could just tell them to
only pay attention to its Properties interface but then they lose the static
key name references and the convenience method calls.
The transitive dependency weight becomes even more problematic when we have
additional providers beyond bouncycastle.
Perhaps we should consider ditching the static getInstance mechanism is
NiFiProperties and instead have that class constructed at specific and
appropriate entry points in the project. The constructed instance would have
populated plain text values for all properties sensitive or otherwise. It
could offer either an object model for properties which accounts for their key,
value, and whether they're sensitive or not - OR - it could simply provide a
method allowing the caller to ask if a given property was sensitive or not.
That said, I'm not sure why or if we'd want to expose whether a property was
sensitive or not. I could see it being useful we want to have callers know
they better not store the value in a log file or exception message.
The ProcessContext (processors), Reporting Context (reporting tasks), and
ConfigurtaionContext (controller services) each make sense for adding a
'getApplicationProperties()' method which returns the NiFiProperties. This
properties object would externalize any crypto libraries so that this
dependency (nifi-properties) remains pure.
> Allow encrypted passwords in configuration files
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-1831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1831
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Configuration, Core Framework
> Affects Versions: 0.6.1
> Reporter: Andy LoPresto
> Assignee: Andy LoPresto
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: configuration, encryption, password, security
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Original Estimate: 504h
> Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> Storing passwords in plaintext in configuration files is not a security best
> practice. While file access can be restricted through OS permissions, these
> configuration files can be accidentally checked into source control, shared
> or deployed to multiple instances, etc.
> NiFi should allow a deployer to provide an encrypted password in the
> configuration file to minimize exposure of the passwords. On application
> start-up, NiFi should decrypt the passwords in memory. NiFi should also
> include a utility to encrypt the raw passwords (and optionally populate the
> configuration files and provide additional metadata in the configuration
> files).
> I am aware this simply shifts the responsibility/delegation of trust from the
> passwords in the properties file to a new location on the same system, but
> mitigating the visibility of the raw passwords in the properties file can be
> one step in a defense in depth approach and is often mandated by security
> policies within organizations using NiFi.
> The key used for encryption should not be hard-coded into the application
> source code, nor should it be universally consistent. The key could be
> determined by reading static information from the deployed system and feeding
> it to a key derivation function based on a cryptographically-secure hash
> function, such as PBKDF2, bcrypt, or scrypt. However, this does introduce
> upgrade, system migration, and portability issues. These challenges will have
> to be kept in consideration when determining the key derivation process.
> Manual key entry is a possibility, and then the master key would only be
> present in memory, but this prevents automatic reboot on loss of power or
> other recovery scenario.
> This must be backward-compatible to allow systems with plaintext passwords to
> continue operating. Options for achieving this are to only attempt to decrypt
> passwords when a sibling property is present, or to match a specific format.
> For these examples, I have used the following default values:
> {code}
> password: thisIsABadPassword
> key: 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA98765432100123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> iv: 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> algorithm: AES/CBC 256-bit
> {code}
> **Note: These values should not be used in production systems -- the key and
> IV are common test values, and an AEAD cipher is preferable to provide cipher
> text integrity assurances, however OpenSSL does not support the use of AEAD
> ciphers for command-line encryption at this time**
> Example 1: *here the sibling property indicates the password is encrypted and
> with which implementation; the absence of the property would default to a raw
> password*
> {code}
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master)
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:25:56 $ echo "thisIsABadPassword" > password.txt
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master)
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:26:47 $ ossl aes-256-cbc -e -nosalt -p -K
> 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA98765432100123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210 -iv
> 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210 -a -in password.txt -out password.enc
> key=0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA98765432100123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> iv =0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master)
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:27:09 $ xxd password.enc
> 0000000: 5643 5856 6146 6250 4158 364f 5743 7646 VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvF
> 0000010: 6963 6b76 4a63 7744 3854 6b67 3731 4c76 ickvJcwD8Tkg71Lv
> 0000020: 4d38 6d32 7952 4776 5739 413d 0a M8m2yRGvW9A=.
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master)
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:27:16 $ more password.enc
> VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A=
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master)
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:27:55 $
> {code}
> In {{nifi.properties}}:
> {code}
> nifi.security.keystorePasswd=VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A=
> nifi.security.keystorePasswd.encrypted=AES-CBC-256
> {code}
> Example 2: *here the encrypted password has a header tag indicating both that
> it is encrypted and the algorithm used*
> {code:java}
> @Test
> public void testShouldDecryptPassword() throws Exception {
> // Arrange
> KeyedCipherProvider cipherProvider = new AESKeyedCipherProvider()
> final String PLAINTEXT = "thisIsABadPassword"
> logger.info("Expected: ${Hex.encodeHexString(PLAINTEXT.bytes)}")
> final byte[] IV = Hex.decodeHex("0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210" as
> char[])
> final byte[] LOCAL_KEY =
> Hex.decodeHex("0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210" * 2 as char[])
> // Generated via openssl enc -a
> final String CIPHER_TEXT =
> "VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A="
> byte[] cipherBytes = Base64.decoder.decode(CIPHER_TEXT)
> SecretKey localKey = new SecretKeySpec(LOCAL_KEY, "AES")
> EncryptionMethod encryptionMethod = EncryptionMethod.AES_CBC
> logger.info("Using algorithm: ${encryptionMethod.getAlgorithm()}")
> logger.info("Cipher text: \$nifipw\$${CIPHER_TEXT}
> ${cipherBytes.length + 8}")
> // Act
> Cipher cipher = cipherProvider.getCipher(encryptionMethod, localKey,
> IV, false)
> byte[] recoveredBytes = cipher.doFinal(cipherBytes)
>
> // OpenSSL adds a newline character during encryption
> String recovered = new String(recoveredBytes, "UTF-8").trim()
> logger.info("Recovered: ${recovered}
> ${Hex.encodeHexString(recoveredBytes)}")
> // Assert
> assert PLAINTEXT.equals(recovered)
> }
> {code}
> In {{nifi.properties}}:
> {code}
> nifi.security.keystorePasswd=$nifipw$VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A=
> {code}
> Ideally, NiFi would use a pluggable implementation architecture to allow
> users to integrate with a variety of secret management services. There are
> both commercial and open source solutions, including CyberArk Enterprise
> Password Vault [1], Hashicorp Vault [2], and Square Keywhiz [3]. In the
> future, this could also be extended to Hardware Security Modules (HSM) like
> SafeNet Luna [4] and Amazon CloudHSM [5].
> [1]
> http://www.cyberark.com/products/privileged-account-security-solution/enterprise-password-vault/
> [2] https://www.vaultproject.io/
> [3] https://square.github.io/keywhiz/
> [4]
> http://www.safenet-inc.com/data-encryption/hardware-security-modules-hsms/luna-hsms-key-management/luna-sa-network-hsm/
> [5] https://aws.amazon.com/cloudhsm/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
