[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15431608#comment-15431608
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-1831:
--------------------------------------

Github user alopresto commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/834
  
    Thanks for all the comments @bbende . I have incorporated them and will be 
pushing a new commit as soon as the build & checkstyle complete. 


> Allow encrypted passwords in configuration files
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-1831
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1831
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Configuration, Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.1
>            Reporter: Andy LoPresto
>            Assignee: Andy LoPresto
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: configuration, encryption, password, security
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 504h
>  Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> Storing passwords in plaintext in configuration files is not a security best 
> practice. While file access can be restricted through OS permissions, these 
> configuration files can be accidentally checked into source control, shared 
> or deployed to multiple instances, etc. 
> NiFi should allow a deployer to provide an encrypted password in the 
> configuration file to minimize exposure of the passwords. On application 
> start-up, NiFi should decrypt the passwords in memory. NiFi should also 
> include a utility to encrypt the raw passwords (and optionally populate the 
> configuration files and provide additional metadata in the configuration 
> files). 
> I am aware this simply shifts the responsibility/delegation of trust from the 
> passwords in the properties file to a new location on the same system, but 
> mitigating the visibility of the raw passwords in the properties file can be 
> one step in a defense in depth approach and is often mandated by security 
> policies within organizations using NiFi. 
> The key used for encryption should not be hard-coded into the application 
> source code, nor should it be universally consistent. The key could be 
> determined by reading static information from the deployed system and feeding 
> it to a key derivation function based on a cryptographically-secure hash 
> function, such as PBKDF2, bcrypt, or scrypt. However, this does introduce 
> upgrade, system migration, and portability issues. These challenges will have 
> to be kept in consideration when determining the key derivation process. 
> Manual key entry is a possibility, and then the master key would only be 
> present in memory, but this prevents automatic reboot on loss of power or 
> other recovery scenario. 
> This must be backward-compatible to allow systems with plaintext passwords to 
> continue operating. Options for achieving this are to only attempt to decrypt 
> passwords when a sibling property is present, or to match a specific format. 
> For these examples, I have used the following default values:
> {code}
> password: thisIsABadPassword
> key: 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA98765432100123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> iv:  0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> algorithm: AES/CBC 256-bit
> {code}
> **Note: These values should not be used in production systems -- the key and 
> IV are common test values, and an AEAD cipher is preferable to provide cipher 
> text integrity assurances, however OpenSSL does not support the use of AEAD 
> ciphers for command-line encryption at this time**
> Example 1: *here the sibling property indicates the password is encrypted and 
> with which implementation; the absence of the property would default to a raw 
> password*
> {code}
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master) 
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:25:56 $ echo "thisIsABadPassword" > password.txt
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master) 
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:26:47 $ ossl aes-256-cbc -e -nosalt -p -K 
> 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA98765432100123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210 -iv 
> 0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210 -a -in password.txt -out password.enc
> key=0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA98765432100123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> iv =0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master) 
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:27:09 $ xxd password.enc
> 0000000: 5643 5856 6146 6250 4158 364f 5743 7646  VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvF
> 0000010: 6963 6b76 4a63 7744 3854 6b67 3731 4c76  ickvJcwD8Tkg71Lv
> 0000020: 4d38 6d32 7952 4776 5739 413d 0a         M8m2yRGvW9A=.
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master) 
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:27:16 $ more password.enc
> VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A=
> hw12203:/Users/alopresto/Workspace/scratch/encrypted-passwords (master) 
> alopresto
> 🔓 0s @ 16:27:55 $
> {code}
> In {{nifi.properties}}: 
> {code}
> nifi.security.keystorePasswd=VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A=
> nifi.security.keystorePasswd.encrypted=AES-CBC-256
> {code}
> Example 2: *here the encrypted password has a header tag indicating both that 
> it is encrypted and the algorithm used*
> {code:java}
>     @Test
>     public void testShouldDecryptPassword() throws Exception {
>         // Arrange
>         KeyedCipherProvider cipherProvider = new AESKeyedCipherProvider()
>         final String PLAINTEXT = "thisIsABadPassword"
>         logger.info("Expected: ${Hex.encodeHexString(PLAINTEXT.bytes)}")
>         final byte[] IV = Hex.decodeHex("0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210" as 
> char[])
>         final byte[] LOCAL_KEY = 
> Hex.decodeHex("0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210" * 2 as char[])
>         // Generated via openssl enc -a
>         final String CIPHER_TEXT = 
> "VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A="
>         byte[] cipherBytes = Base64.decoder.decode(CIPHER_TEXT)
>         SecretKey localKey = new SecretKeySpec(LOCAL_KEY, "AES")
>         EncryptionMethod encryptionMethod = EncryptionMethod.AES_CBC
>         logger.info("Using algorithm: ${encryptionMethod.getAlgorithm()}")
>         logger.info("Cipher text: \$nifipw\$${CIPHER_TEXT} 
> ${cipherBytes.length + 8}")
>         // Act
>         Cipher cipher = cipherProvider.getCipher(encryptionMethod, localKey, 
> IV, false)
>         byte[] recoveredBytes = cipher.doFinal(cipherBytes)
>         
>         // OpenSSL adds a newline character during encryption
>         String recovered = new String(recoveredBytes, "UTF-8").trim()
>         logger.info("Recovered: ${recovered} 
> ${Hex.encodeHexString(recoveredBytes)}")
>         // Assert
>         assert PLAINTEXT.equals(recovered)
>     }
> {code}
> In {{nifi.properties}}: 
> {code}
> nifi.security.keystorePasswd=$nifipw$VCXVaFbPAX6OWCvFickvJcwD8Tkg71LvM8m2yRGvW9A=
> {code}
> Ideally, NiFi would use a pluggable implementation architecture to allow 
> users to integrate with a variety of secret management services. There are 
> both commercial and open source solutions, including CyberArk Enterprise 
> Password Vault [1], Hashicorp Vault [2], and Square Keywhiz [3]. In the 
> future, this could also be extended to Hardware Security Modules (HSM) like 
> SafeNet Luna [4] and Amazon CloudHSM [5]. 
> [1] 
> http://www.cyberark.com/products/privileged-account-security-solution/enterprise-password-vault/
> [2] https://www.vaultproject.io/
> [3] https://square.github.io/keywhiz/
> [4] 
> http://www.safenet-inc.com/data-encryption/hardware-security-modules-hsms/luna-hsms-key-management/luna-sa-network-hsm/
> [5] https://aws.amazon.com/cloudhsm/



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to