[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15449105#comment-15449105
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2694:
--------------------------------------
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/970
Cluster - Two Phase Commit clean up
NIFI-2694:
- Addressing instances where phase one objects were being referenced
instead of phase two objects.
- Code clean up.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mcgilman/nifi NIFI-2694
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/970.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #970
----
commit 50ea1007547b3a818a5147222419079e6fdb7dec
Author: Matt Gilman <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-30T14:07:09Z
NIFI-2694:
- Addressing instances where phase one objects were being referenced
instead of phase two objects.
- Code clean up.
----
> Cluster - Two Phase Commit Clean Up
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-2694
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2694
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Framework
> Reporter: Matt Gilman
> Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> Following up on NIFI-2687 [1] which addressed some regressions introduced in
> NIFI-2635 [2], found a couple more instances where the wrong variables were
> being referenced. While NIFI-2687 broke some functionality, reseting counters
> and creating processors reference the request payload in the phase 2 instead
> of using the payload from phase 1 as designed. These endpoints need to be
> updated to reference the appropriate request payload.
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2687
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2635
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
