[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17167468#comment-17167468
]
Kevin Doran commented on NIFIREG-292:
-------------------------------------
[~ChrisEng] Ideally, perhaps, however, the different clustering model used by
NiFi, where changes to the state are replicated across all nodes, mean that the
existing File-based providers are sufficient in NiFi for HA, whereas the NiFi
Registry clustering approach relies on an external, central store for all state
(ie, the database)
> Add database implementations of UserGroupProvider and AccessPolicyProvider
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFIREG-292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-292
> Project: NiFi Registry
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Bryan Bende
> Assignee: Bryan Bende
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 3h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should offer database backed implementations of UserGroupProvider and
> AccessPolicyProvider as an alternative to the file-based impls. We have LDAP
> and Ranger alternatives, but for people not using those, the DB impls would
> be a good way to get the data off the local filesystem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
