[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15555135#comment-15555135
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2874:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1114

    NIFI-2874: Ensure that when reading more data from an InputStream the…

    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
    
    … StreamDemarcator appropriately updates the max index that can be read 
from the buffer

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/markap14/nifi NIFI-2874

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1114.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1114
    
----
commit 0f1eb298cc42933711f60312b57a7d66004c7d13
Author: Mark Payne <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-10-07T13:52:03Z

    NIFI-2874: Ensure that when reading more data from an InputStream the 
StreamDemarcator appropriately updates the max index that can be read from the 
buffer

----


> StreamDemarcator can return wrong data for token
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-2874
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2874
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Mark Payne
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.1.0, 0.7.1
>
>
> There is a case where StreamDemarcator can return the wrong data for a token. 
> If a token ends at the end of the buffer, and the next token is smaller than 
> the previous, it can result in the next token keeping part of the buffer's 
> content. The code below is a unit test that exposes this:
> {code}
>     @Test
>     public void testOnBufferSplitNoTrailingDelimiter() throws IOException {
>         final byte[] inputData = "Yes\nNo".getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
>         ByteArrayInputStream is = new ByteArrayInputStream(inputData);
>         StreamDemarcator scanner = new StreamDemarcator(is, "\n".getBytes(), 
> 1000, 3);
>         final byte[] first = scanner.nextToken();
>         final byte[] second = scanner.nextToken();
>         assertNotNull(first);
>         assertNotNull(second);
>         assertArrayEquals(first, new byte[] {'Y', 'e', 's'});
>         assertArrayEquals(second, new byte[] {'N', 'o'});
>     }
> {code}
> In this case, the second token, which should be 'No' comes back as 'Nos' 
> because it contains the 's' from the previous token.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to