adamdebreceni commented on a change in pull request #1015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/1015#discussion_r582093910
##########
File path: extensions/standard-processors/processors/GetFile.cpp
##########
@@ -228,42 +228,48 @@ void GetFile::pollListing(std::queue<std::string> &list,
const GetFileRequest &r
bool GetFile::acceptFile(std::string fullName, std::string name, const
GetFileRequest &request) {
logger_->log_trace("Checking file: %s", fullName);
+#ifdef WIN32
+ struct _stat64 statbuf;
+ if (_stat64(fullName.c_str(), &statbuf) != 0) {
+ return false;
+ }
+#else
struct stat statbuf;
+ if (stat(fullName.c_str(), &statbuf) != 0) {
+ return false;
+ }
+#endif
Review comment:
we could use `utils::file::exists` and then call
`utils::file::file_size` and `utils::file::last_write_time` separately, my
concern with this, is that we took one (supposedly) atomic `stat`-call and made
three separate calls, on the other side, that would limit the number of places
`stat` is explicitly called from, moreover if we trace where this `acceptFile`
is called from (`file::list_dir`) we could even ignore the possibility of a
non-existing file
1. call `stat` explicitly (current)
2. use 3 calls (exists, file_size, last_write_time)
3. use 2 calls (file_size, last_write_time) because we don't care about
non-existing files because a) this method is called with existing files b) we
will handle them anyway downstream when we actually read it
4. something else (make file_size, last_write_time return optionals, etc )
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
