adamdebreceni commented on a change in pull request #1004:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/1004#discussion_r603223913



##########
File path: libminifi/test/sql-tests/SQLTestPlan.h
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+/**
+ *
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#pragma once
+
+#include "../TestBase.h"
+
+class SQLTestPlan {
+ public:
+  SQLTestPlan(TestController& controller, const std::string& connection_str, 
const std::string& sql_processor, std::initializer_list<core::Relationship> 
output_rels) {
+    plan_ = controller.createPlan();
+    processor_ = plan_->addProcessor(sql_processor, sql_processor);
+    plan_->setProperty(processor_, "DB Controller Service", "ODBCService");
+    input_ = plan_->addConnection({}, {"success", "d"}, processor_);
+    for (const auto& output_rel : output_rels) {
+      outputs_[output_rel] = plan_->addConnection(processor_, output_rel, {});
+    }
+
+    // initialize database service
+    auto service = plan_->addController("ODBCService", "ODBCService");
+    plan_->setProperty(service, 
minifi::sql::controllers::DatabaseService::ConnectionString.getName(), 
connection_str);
+  }
+
+  std::string getContent(const std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile>& flow_file) {
+    return plan_->getContent(flow_file);
+  }
+
+  std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile> 
addInput(std::initializer_list<std::pair<std::string, std::string>> attributes 
= {}, const utils::optional<std::string>& content = {}) {
+    auto flow_file = std::make_shared<minifi::FlowFileRecord>();
+    for (const auto& attr : attributes) {
+      flow_file->setAttribute(attr.first, attr.second);
+    }
+    if (content) {
+      auto claim = 
std::make_shared<minifi::ResourceClaim>(plan_->getContentRepo());
+      auto content_stream = plan_->getContentRepo()->write(*claim);
+      int ret = 
content_stream->write(reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(const_cast<char*>(content->c_str())),
 content->length());
+      REQUIRE(ret == content->length());
+      flow_file->setOffset(0);
+      flow_file->setSize(content->length());
+      flow_file->setResourceClaim(claim);
+    }
+    input_->put(flow_file);
+    return flow_file;
+  }
+
+  std::shared_ptr<core::Processor> getSQLProcessor() {
+    return processor_;
+  }
+
+  void run(bool reschedule = false) {
+    if (reschedule) {
+      plan_->reset(reschedule);
+    }
+    plan_->runProcessor(0);  // run the one and only sql processor
+  }
+
+  std::map<core::Relationship, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile>>> 
getAllOutputs() {
+    std::map<core::Relationship, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile>>> 
flow_file_map;
+    for (const auto& output : outputs_) {
+      flow_file_map[output.first] = getOutputs(output.first);
+    }
+    return flow_file_map;
+  }
+
+  std::vector<std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile>> getOutputs(const 
core::Relationship& relationship) {
+    auto conn = outputs_[relationship];
+    REQUIRE(conn);
+    std::vector<std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile>> flow_files;
+    std::set<std::shared_ptr<core::FlowFile>> expired;
+    while (auto flow_file = conn->poll(expired)) {
+      REQUIRE(expired.empty());
+      flow_files.push_back(std::move(flow_file));
+    }
+    REQUIRE(expired.empty());

Review comment:
       might be the case that poll returns nullptr, then the expired wouldn't 
be checked, although I understand that it is an unlikely event, should I remove 
it?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to