[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15570913#comment-15570913
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2861:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1127

    NIFI-2861 ControlRate should accept more than one flow file per execution 
(1.x)

    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [X] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [X] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [X] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [X] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [X] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
    
    * Support multiple files per onTrigger call.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jskora/nifi NIFI-2861-1.x

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1127.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1127
    
----
commit d66dd6d0f59784da14a26fce50542224e1cf4b07
Author: Joe Skora <jsk...@gmail.com>
Date:   2016-10-13T05:14:23Z

    NIFI-2861 ControlRate should accept more than one flow file per execution
    
    * Support multiple files per onTrigger call.

----


> ControlRate should accept more than one flow file per execution
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-2861
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2861
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.7.0
>            Reporter: Joe Skora
>            Assignee: Joe Skora
>
> The {{ControlRate}} processor implements a {{FlowFileFilter}} that returns 
> the {{FlowFileFilter.ACCEPT_AND_TERMINATE}} result if the {{FlowFile}} fits 
> with the rate limit, affectively limiting it to one {{FlowFile}} per 
> {{ConrolRate.onTrigger()}} invocation.  This is a significant bottleneck when 
> processing very large quantities of small files making it unlikely to hit the 
> rate limits.
> It should allow multiple files, perhaps with a configurable maximum, per 
> {{ControlRate.onTrigger()}} invocation by issuing the 
> {{FlowFileFilter.ACCEPT_AND_CONTINUE}} result until the limits are reached.  
> In a preliminary test this eliminated the bottleneck.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to