szaszm opened a new pull request #1136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/1136


   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-1610
   
   With MINIFICPP-1351, I introduced a connection lock before the message lock 
to avoid a race condition on closing the connection. It went before the message 
lock, because when both are taken, connection lock has to come first to avoid a 
deadlock.
   This caused notifyStop to wait until the messages in flight timed out and 
onTrigger stopped before being able to take the connection lock, then the 
message lock, then interrupt the messages, thus defeating the interruption.
   
   This issue is about fixing the situation by first taking the message lock 
without the connection lock, interrupting the messages, then releasing the lock 
and taking the connection lock (and getting it after onTrigger terminated 
early, thanks to the interruptions) and terminating the connection.
   
   Aside from that, I made an effort to reduce the runtime of 
PublishKafkaOnScheduleTests when no local kafka nodes are running. It tries to 
connect to one and waits for timeout, but the test doesn't need an actual 
running broker, this is just a side effect. Reduced timeouts, the runtime went 
from ~30sec to ~1.5sec.
   
   ---
   
   Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi - MiNiFi C++.
   
   In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
   to ensure the following steps have been taken:
   
   ### For all changes:
   - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
        in the commit message?
   
   - [x] Does your PR title start with MINIFICPP-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
   
   - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically main)?
   
   - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
   
   ### For code changes:
   - [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [x] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file?
   - [x] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file?
   
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which 
it is rendered?
   
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI 
results for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to