bbende commented on a change in pull request #5630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5630#discussion_r787778554
##########
File path:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/FlowResource.java
##########
@@ -1358,6 +1359,41 @@ public Response getReportingTaskTypes(
return generateOkResponse(entity).build();
}
+ @GET
+ @Consumes(MediaType.WILDCARD)
+ @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+ @Path("runtime-manifest")
+ @ApiOperation(
+ value = "Retrieves the runtime manifest for this NiFi instance.",
+ notes = NON_GUARANTEED_ENDPOINT,
+ response = RuntimeManifest.class,
+ authorizations = {
+ @Authorization(value = "Read - /flow")
+ }
+ )
+ @ApiResponses(
+ value = {
+ @ApiResponse(code = 400, message = "NiFi was unable to
complete the request because it was invalid. The request should not be retried
without modification."),
+ @ApiResponse(code = 401, message = "Client could not be
authenticated."),
+ @ApiResponse(code = 403, message = "Client is not
authorized to make this request."),
+ @ApiResponse(code = 409, message = "The request was valid
but NiFi was not in the appropriate state to process it. Retrying the same
request later may be successful.")
+ }
+ )
+ public Response getRuntimeManifest() throws InterruptedException {
+
+ authorizeFlow();
+
+ if (isReplicateRequest()) {
+ return replicate(HttpMethod.GET);
+ }
Review comment:
I debated about this, but I based it off the end-points that are
currently used to retrieve available types for
processors/controller-services/reporting-tasks, and since those don't
replicate, I figured it was ok to leave this one not replicating until we come
up with a good reason that it needs to.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
