[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15648770#comment-15648770
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3002:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1189

    Remove legacy site to site code to ensure port availability is accurate

    NIFI-3002:
    - Removing legacy code when retrieving site to site details when the target 
instance is this local NiFi.
    - Ensures the UI accurately reflects available remote ports.
    NIFI-2603:
    - Fixing color of remote input/output port status in connection label.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/mcgilman/nifi NIFI-3002

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1189.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1189
    
----
commit 11d54aa8b4a31e81b020740d5d07df4ae23862ef
Author: Matt Gilman <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-11-08T20:57:21Z

    NIFI-3002:
    - Removing legacy code when retrieving site to site details when the target 
instance is this local NiFi.
    - Ensures the UI accurately reflects available remote ports.
    NIFI-2603:
    - Fixing color of remote output port status in connection label.

----


> Remove legacy code for retrieving Site To Site details
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3002
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3002
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Matt Gilman
>            Assignee: Matt Gilman
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> Earlier versions of Apache NiFi could potentially enter a distributed 
> deadlock when load balancing with a Remote Process Group. Retrieval of these 
> details was obtained within the framework as a remote call was technically 
> unnecessary.  Subsequently, these actions were made asynchronous but the port 
> retrieval was left in place. This could lead to some confusion as the UI may 
> report some ports as available when technically policies may prevent data 
> transfers. By removing the legacy code, the UI will accurately reflect the 
> port availability.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to