greyp9 commented on PR #6131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6131#issuecomment-1185836381

   > Thanks for pushing this @greyp9 ! I think this gets us really far down 
field. I left some comments inline, mostly around terminology / naming 
conventions, and documentation. I also think the tests that were added are 
really helpful, but I feel like some of the code is super repetitive and some 
of the sets of assertions can be easily refactored into a method so that the 
code is a little cleaner & less verbose - unless I missed some discrepancy 
between very similar chunks of code that are actually different.
   
   Just pushed another commit; it should address the issues you noted.
   
   There were some efficiencies to be gained in the unit tests, but the 
variables needed to verify behavior made the suggested refactor difficult.  
Hope the updates reach the needed bar.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to