CloudWise-Lukemiao commented on PR #6190: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6190#issuecomment-1196571706
> > Thanks for pointing out the problem. Next, I will change the query interface mode of JDBC to the session mode of iotdb, and I will remove the JDBC insertion mode. I hope to discuss the options and general design on the associate JIRA issue would be a great next step > > Thanks for the response @CloudWise-Lukemiao, that sounds like a good next step. Including unit tests for a new processor is also important. > > Thanks for pointing out the problem. Next, I will change the query interface mode of JDBC to the session mode of iotdb, and I will remove the JDBC insertion mode. I hope to discuss the options and general design on the associate JIRA issue would be a great next step > > Thanks for the response @CloudWise-Lukemiao, that sounds like a good next step. Including unit tests for a new processor is also important. hi,There is a problem I want to discuss. In addition to the data source, the putiotdb processor interface also needs a devicesid configuration (string), measurements (array), datatypes (array) and measurements, and batchsize (submitted quantity). As shown in the figure。 <img width="746" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/76942485/181229086-8bb677b2-3fa4-4ef7-8f38-4ffaee29057a.png";> -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
![https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/76942485/181229086-8bb677b2-3fa4-4ef7-8f38-4ffaee29057a.png"](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/76942485/181229086-8bb677b2-3fa4-4ef7-8f38-4ffaee29057a.png"){kind=link}