adamdebreceni commented on code in PR #1451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/1451#discussion_r1027877982


##########
extensions/standard-processors/tests/unit/YamlProcessGroupParserTests.cpp:
##########
@@ -102,30 +102,190 @@ TEST_CASE("Cannot connect processors from different 
groups", "[YamlProcessGroupP
   }
 
   SECTION("Connecting processors in their child/parent group") {
-    Conn1.source = UnresolvedProc{Child1_Proc1.id};
-    Conn1.destination = UnresolvedProc{Child1_Port1.id};
+    Conn1.source = Proc{Child1_Proc1.id, Child1_Proc1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_SOURCE};
+    Conn1.destination = Proc{Child1_Port1.id, Child1_Port1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_DESTINATION};
 
-    Child1_Conn1.source = UnresolvedProc{Proc1.id};
-    Child1_Conn1.destination = UnresolvedProc{Port1.id};
+    Child1_Conn1.source = Proc{Proc1.id, Proc1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_SOURCE};
+    Child1_Conn1.destination = Proc{Port1.id, Proc1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_DESTINATION};
   }
 
   SECTION("Connecting processors between their own and their child/parent 
group") {
     Conn1.source = Proc1;
-    Conn1.destination = UnresolvedProc{Child1_Port1.id};
+    Conn1.destination = Proc{Child1_Port1.id, Child1_Port1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_DESTINATION};
 
-    Child1_Conn1.source = UnresolvedProc{Port1.id};
+    Child1_Conn1.source = Proc{Port1.id, Port1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_SOURCE};
     Child1_Conn1.destination = Child1_Proc1;
   }
 
   SECTION("Connecting processors in a sibling group") {
     Conn1.source = Proc1;
     Conn1.destination = Port1;
 
-    Child1_Conn1.source = UnresolvedProc{Child2_Proc1.id};
-    Child1_Conn1.destination = UnresolvedProc{Child2_Port1.id};
+    Child1_Conn1.source = Proc{Child2_Proc1.id, Child2_Proc1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_SOURCE};
+    Child1_Conn1.destination = Proc{Child2_Port1.id, Child2_Port1.name, 
ConnectionFailure::UNRESOLVED_DESTINATION};
   }
 
   auto root = config.getRootFromPayload(pattern.serialize().join("\n"));
 
   verifyProcessGroup(*root, pattern);
 }
+
+TEST_CASE("Processor can communicate with root process group's input port", 
"[YamlProcessGroupParser4]") {
+  auto pattern = Group("root")
+    .With({Conn{"Conn1",
+                Proc{"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001", "Proc1"},
+                InputPort{"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000002", "Port1"}}})
+    .With({Proc{"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001", "Proc1"}})
+    .With({
+      Group("Child1")
+      .With({InputPort{"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000002", "Port1"}})

Review Comment:
   shouldn't we rather remove the child group to confirm to the current 
description (communication with the root process group)? this seems to be the 
same as the test after it (Child process group can provide input for root 
processor through output port)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to