[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15671835#comment-15671835
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3011:
--------------------------------------
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1233#discussion_r88329420
--- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/pom.xml ---
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
<module>nifi-html-bundle</module>
<module>nifi-scripting-bundle</module>
<module>nifi-elasticsearch-bundle</module>
--- End diff --
Could this be changed to match how the Kafka bundle does version hierarchy?
> Support Elasticsearch 5.0 for Put/FetchElasticsearch processors
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-3011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3011
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Matt Burgess
> Assignee: Matt Burgess
>
> Now that Elastic has released a new major version (5.0) of Elasticsearch, the
> Put/FetchElasticsearch processors would need to be upgraded (or duplicated)
> as the major version of the transport client needs to match the major version
> of the Elasticsearch cluster.
> If upgrade is selected, then Put/FetchES will no longer work with
> Elasticsearch 2.x clusters, so in that case users would want to switch to the
> Http versions of those processors. However this might not be desirable (due
> to performance concerns with the HTTP API vs the transport API), so care must
> be taken when deciding whether to upgrade the existing processors or create
> new ones.
> Creating new versions of these processors (to use the 5.0 transport client)
> will also take some consideration, as it is unlikely the different versions
> can coexist in the same NAR due to classloading issues (multiple versions of
> JARs containing the same class names, e.g.). It may be necessary to create an
> "elasticsearch-5.0" version of the NAR, containing only the new versions of
> these processors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
