[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640717#comment-17640717
 ] 

Kondakov Artem edited comment on MINIFICPP-1994 at 11/29/22 1:51 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, [~aboda] 

"In case a processor has "INPUT_FORBIDDEN" requirement, that means that the 
given processor is a source (usually the ones that match list* or get* or 
consume*), so those don't need failure relationship. They just create a 
flowfile based on the data they receive, no flowfile is processed, so the 
processing can't go wrong. "

 

Then how should resource availability errors be handled in this case? For 
example, I am trying to get a list of files using 
org.apache.nifi.minifi.processors.ListSFTP by cron schedule. If the remote 
server is not available at the moment, how do I handle this case

I think for some other processors, a completely unforeseen situation may also 
arise when something went wrong, and at the same time I cannot make an alert, 
because no flow-file will be formed

 


was (Author: JIRAUSER287304):
Hello, [~aboda] 

"In case a processor has "INPUT_FORBIDDEN" requirement, that means that the 
given processor is a source (usually the ones that match list* or get* or 
consume*), so those don't need failure relationship. They just create a 
flowfile based on the data they receive, no flowfile is processed, so the 
processing can't go wrong. "

 

Then how should resource availability errors be handled in this case? For 
example, I am trying to get a list of files using 
org.apache.nifi.minifi.processors.ListSFTP by cron schedule. If the remote 
server is not available at the moment, how do I handle this case

> Missing "failure", "retry" relationships for PutSql processor (and other 
> processors)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFICPP-1994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-1994
>             Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Kondakov Artem
>            Assignee: Adam Debreceni
>            Priority: Major
>
> According to the manifest, sent by minifi, PutSql processors (and many 
> others) do not have a failure relationship, while in the apache / nifi 
> project similar processors have it.
> I think maintaining these relationships is important.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to