ChrisSamo632 commented on code in PR #6687:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6687#discussion_r1055894635
##########
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-client-service/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/elasticsearch/integration/ElasticSearchClientService_IT.java:
##########
@@ -205,19 +206,29 @@ void testVerifyFailedApiKeyAuth() {
@Test
void testBasicSearch() throws Exception {
+ assertBasicSearch(null);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ void testBasicSearchRequestParameters() throws Exception {
+ assertBasicSearch(createParameters("preference", "_local"));
+ }
+
+ private void assertBasicSearch(final Map<String, String>
requestParameters) throws JsonProcessingException {
final Map<String, Object> temp = new MapBuilder()
- .of("size", 10, "query", new MapBuilder().of("match_all", new
HashMap<>()).build(),
- "aggs", new MapBuilder()
- .of("term_counts", new MapBuilder()
- .of("terms", new MapBuilder()
- .of("field", "msg", "size", 5)
- .build())
- .build())
- .build())
+ .of("size", 10, "query", new MapBuilder().of("match_all", new
HashMap<>()).build(),
Review Comment:
I don't think this is required, the use of `HashMap` here (and throughout
all uses of the `MapBuilder` class in the tests) has been to create an empty
Map (i.e. JSON Object) for the `match_all` part of the Elasticsearch Query DSL
request body
I have, however, changed the `MapBuilder` to use a `LinkedHashMap`
internally instead of a `HashMap`, which might be relevant for keeping things
in order (although that shouldn't matter for the submission to Elasticsearch)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@nifi.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
