[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15675691#comment-15675691
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3011:
--------------------------------------
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1233#discussion_r88597130
--- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-5-bundle/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
contributor
+license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for
additional
+information regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to
+You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use
+this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of
+the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required
+by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the
+License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR
CONDITIONS
+OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific
+language governing permissions and limitations under the License. -->
+<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
+ <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
+
+ <parent>
+ <groupId>org.apache.nifi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>nifi-nar-bundles</artifactId>
+ <version>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
+ </parent>
+
+ <groupId>org.apache.nifi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>nifi-elasticsearch-5-bundle</artifactId>
+ <packaging>pom</packaging>
+
+ <properties>
+ <lucene.version>6.3.0</lucene.version>
--- End diff --
It has to be in both the processor POM and NAR POM, so when the two bundles
were different, I included it in each of the parent bundle POMs. However, I'm
consolidating the bundles (per your suggestion a la Kafka), and now it can't be
set in the parent POM, now it will have to be set in each NAR/processors pair.
This is due to a higher parent POM setting lucene.version for repository stuff,
and the ES POM using that property to choose a version of Lucene (for some
reason it's not hard-coded in the published POM). Strange but true :)
> Support Elasticsearch 5.0 for Put/FetchElasticsearch processors
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-3011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3011
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Matt Burgess
> Assignee: Matt Burgess
>
> Now that Elastic has released a new major version (5.0) of Elasticsearch, the
> Put/FetchElasticsearch processors would need to be upgraded (or duplicated)
> as the major version of the transport client needs to match the major version
> of the Elasticsearch cluster.
> If upgrade is selected, then Put/FetchES will no longer work with
> Elasticsearch 2.x clusters, so in that case users would want to switch to the
> Http versions of those processors. However this might not be desirable (due
> to performance concerns with the HTTP API vs the transport API), so care must
> be taken when deciding whether to upgrade the existing processors or create
> new ones.
> Creating new versions of these processors (to use the 5.0 transport client)
> will also take some consideration, as it is unlikely the different versions
> can coexist in the same NAR due to classloading issues (multiple versions of
> JARs containing the same class names, e.g.). It may be necessary to create an
> "elasticsearch-5.0" version of the NAR, containing only the new versions of
> these processors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)