[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15722268#comment-15722268
]
Joseph Witt commented on NIFI-3071:
-----------------------------------
mark - ok +1 to the update for PutSplunk. Am concerned about the performance
hit to tail file but we'll have to observe and improve that. either way as
oleg points out getting rid of these classes is a win and it eliminate this
overusage of java.io code.
> Consider deprecating org.apache.nifi.stream.io.ByteArrayOutputStream in favor
> of jaba.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-3071
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3071
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Oleg Zhurakousky
> Assignee: Mark Payne
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> I believe the "efficiency" statements need to be revisited. For example,
> preliminary testing shows that there are no performance difference between
> using the one provided with java.io.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
