mattyb149 commented on PR #35:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-maven/pull/35#issuecomment-1767342297

   +1 on this PR from me, I can merge unless @nandorsoma wants to :)  
@nicoloboschi is this the only feature of NiFi that LangStream uses? For 
LangStream and Pulsar, is it the metadata and/or approach to classloader 
isolation that makes the NAR format useful? If so I definitely think we should 
we refactor this to be a generic "extension packager" or something and publish 
it as such (as @nandorsoma suggested), and we can add NiFi-specific stuff for 
the NiFi plugin and publish that too.
   
   If we want to get fancy we can accept extensions for doc generation (so it's 
not NiFi-specific) and even the supported annotations (to make it even more 
flexible). That's quite a bit of work though, I'd tackle it in my spare time 
but that's pretty sparse these days. Would be happy to review a "Feature 
Proposal" on the 
[wiki](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals) 
if someone wanted to put up a requirements and/or design document.
   
   For the "different context" to which Soma is referring, stay tuned and keep 
an eye on that Feature Proposals page ;)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to