pvillard31 commented on PR #7980: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7980#issuecomment-1793365286
I'm not sure this is the approach we want to take here. We have users with a mix of hortonworks / confluent setup (schema encoding following the hortonworks approach but sending the data into confluent, and vice versa). We removed the HWX Schema Registry but I think removing the schema encoding strategies does not have the same level of impact and one could wonder why we keep Confluent but not HWX/Cloudera. A cleaner approach would probably to have the schema encoding as an extension point so that it can be part of the NARs but it sounds like a significant effort that is not really worth it. Wouldn't be easier here to just rename the classes using the Cloudera name and keep both Cloudera and Confluent? I could even see value in reverting the removal of the HWX Schema Registry and just rename it given that we keep the equivalent for Confluent and we're adding support for additional Schema Registries (Glue, Apicurio, etc). Thoughts? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
