[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Bean updated NIFI-8968:
----------------------------
Attachment: Compare_Invoke_PostHTTP.json
> Improve throughput performance for InvokeHTTP
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-8968
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8968
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.14.0
> Reporter: Mark Bean
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Compare_Invoke_PostHTTP.json,
> ListenHTTP-BytesOut-sizeFilter.PNG, ListenHTTP-BytesOut.PNG,
> ListenHTTP-FFOut-sizeFilter.PNG, ListenHTTP-FFOut.PNG,
> PostHTTP_vs_InvokeHTTP.json, PostHTTP_vs_InvokeHTTP.xml
>
>
> InvokeHTTP is the preferred processor to use over the deprecated PostHTTP.
> However, PostHTTP outperforms InvokeHTTP (at least in POST mode). A template
> and a JSON file have been attached to this ticket for benchmarking the two
> processors. Using this flow, PostHTTP was observed to have a throughput of
> approximately 5 times greater than InvokeHTTP.
> In addition, it was noted that InvokeHTTP had approximately 5 times as many
> tasks and 5 times the task duration for a given 5 minute stats window. And,
> the statistics of Bytes Read and Bytes Transferred remain at zero for
> InvokeHTTP; this area accurate statistics also needs to be addressed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
