[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-12933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17830412#comment-17830412
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-12933:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 8eb013a813ad5e8452a3eacd9774068a7bb4d3b3 in nifi's branch 
refs/heads/main from Peter Turcsanyi
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=8eb013a813 ]

NIFI-12933 Rearranged properties on GCP processors

Also used current API methods for relationships/properties collections

Signed-off-by: Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com>

This closes #8545.


> Rearrange properties on GCP processors
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-12933
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-12933
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Peter Turcsanyi
>            Assignee: Peter Turcsanyi
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Parent classes of the GCP processors define some common properties and they 
> are added to the processors via 
> {{{}descriptors.addAll(super.getSupportedPropertyDescriptors()){}}}.
> This practice leads to weird property ordering in most cases and it is not 
> worth using it. E.g. "Number of retries" precedes "Bucket" and "Key" 
> properties in PutGCSObject.
> Get rid of {{super.getSupportedPropertyDescriptors()}} and reorder the 
> properties in a more reasonable way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to