[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17853833#comment-17853833
 ] 

Matt Gilman edited comment on NIFI-13367 at 6/10/24 11:08 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

[~mosermw] 

Thanks for the comment! Definitely have thought the same thing. The first 
priority was getting parity with the old NiFi UI where we showed the root 
Progress Group name. This was added originally so the user can easily identify 
which tab is associated with a given NiFi instance. This is most important for 
users managing multiple instances. We should be able to look at the additional 
considerations you laid out above work them into the title as well. This should 
provide a much better Back behavior. 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13384


was (Author: mcgilman):
[~mosermw] 

Thanks for the comment! Definitely have thought the same thing. The first 
priority was getting parity with the old NiFi UI where we showed the root 
Progress Group name. This was added originally so the user can easily identify 
which tab is associated with a given NiFi instance. This is most important for 
users managing multiple instances. We should be able to look at the additional 
considerations you laid out above work them into the title as well. This should 
provide a much better Back behavior. 

> Page title should be Root PG Name
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-13367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13367
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Core UI
>            Reporter: Matt Gilman
>            Assignee: Matt Gilman
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-M4
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The page title for the canvas should be the root Process Group name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to