exceptionfactory commented on code in PR #9196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/9196#discussion_r1734708426
##########
nifi-extension-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestValidateRecord.java:
##########
@@ -593,6 +594,47 @@ public void testValidateMaps() throws IOException,
InitializationException, Malf
}
}
+ @Test
+ void testTimeZoneWithTimeStamp() throws Exception {
+ final TimeZone defaultTimezone = TimeZone.getDefault();
+ //Ensure the timezone is UTC in order to validate the use of a
timezone in the timestamp pattern is taken into account.
+ TimeZone.setDefault(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));
+ final String timestampWithTimeZonePattern = "EEE, dd MMM yyyy
HH:mm:ssZ";
+ final String schema = new
String(Files.readAllBytes(Paths.get("src/test/resources/TestValidateRecord/timestampWithTimeZone.avsc")),
"UTF-8");
+ final CSVReader csvReader = new CSVReader();
+ runner.addControllerService("reader", csvReader);
+ runner.setProperty(csvReader,
SchemaAccessUtils.SCHEMA_ACCESS_STRATEGY,
SchemaAccessUtils.SCHEMA_TEXT_PROPERTY);
+ runner.setProperty(csvReader, SchemaAccessUtils.SCHEMA_TEXT, schema);
+ runner.setProperty(csvReader, CSVUtils.FIRST_LINE_IS_HEADER, "true");
+ runner.setProperty(csvReader, CSVUtils.VALUE_SEPARATOR, "◆");
+ runner.setProperty(csvReader, DateTimeUtils.TIMESTAMP_FORMAT,
timestampWithTimeZonePattern);
+ runner.enableControllerService(csvReader);
+
+ final CSVRecordSetWriter csvWriter = new CSVRecordSetWriter();
+ runner.addControllerService("writer", csvWriter);
+ runner.setProperty(csvWriter, "Schema Write Strategy",
"full-schema-attribute");
+ runner.setProperty(csvWriter, DateTimeUtils.TIMESTAMP_FORMAT,
timestampWithTimeZonePattern);
+ runner.enableControllerService(csvWriter);
+
+ runner.setProperty(ValidateRecord.RECORD_READER, "reader");
+ runner.setProperty(ValidateRecord.RECORD_WRITER, "writer");
+ runner.setProperty(ValidateRecord.ALLOW_EXTRA_FIELDS, "false");
+ runner.setProperty(ValidateRecord.MAX_VALIDATION_DETAILS_LENGTH,
"4000");
+ runner.setProperty(ValidateRecord.VALIDATION_DETAILS_ATTRIBUTE_NAME,
"valDetails");
+
+ final String content =
"apache_date◆apache_ip_source◆apache_method◆apache_path◆apache_query_string◆apache_response_code◆apache_referer◆apache_user_agent\n"
+
+ "Wed, 24 Jul 2024
15:04:23+0200◆10.4.3.20◆GET◆/path◆?test=toto◆200◆-◆";
+
+ runner.enqueue(content);
+ runner.run();
+
+ runner.assertTransferCount(ValidateRecord.REL_VALID, 1);
+ final MockFlowFile validFlowFile =
runner.getFlowFilesForRelationship(ValidateRecord.REL_VALID).get(0);
+ //Validate timezone is taken into account
+ assertTrue(validFlowFile.getContent().contains("Wed, 24 Jul 2024
13:04:23+0000"));
Review Comment:
Thanks for the explanation. I thought that might be the case, however, a
goal of the test should be to assert the same values. As a timestamp without a
zone is inherently local, the value should not be recalculated, so I recommend
designing the test with that in mind.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
