[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Zsihovszki Krisztina reassigned NIFI-13633:
-------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Zsihovszki Krisztina

> AllowScientificNotation default false causing existing service to fail
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-13633
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13633
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.26.0, 1.27.0
>            Reporter: Yuanhao Zhu
>            Assignee: Zsihovszki Krisztina
>            Priority: Major
>
> Recently after upgrading to nifi 1.27.0(We skipped 1.26.0 since the azure 
> keyvault related functions are not working properly for dependency 
> conflicts), our ConvertRecord processor(ParquetRecordReader and 
> JsonRecordSetWriter) start to no longer able to convert the parquet file and 
> complains about not being able to handle "NaN".
>  
> 2024-08-06 06:42:20,852 ERROR [Timer-Driven Process Thread-17] 
> o.a.n.processors.standard.ConvertRecord 
> ConvertRecord[id=2f9e8b7a-045c-301d-f79c-8f4b417eba69] Failed to write 
> MapRecord[\{sampling_rate=NaN, 
> qid_mapping=2::0::11::0_1::1::0::3::0_1::0::6::0_8, 
> ingestion_time=[Ljava.lang.Object;@2ac05a68, 
> z_timestamp=[Ljava.lang.Object;@6239681b, value_string=null, 
> asset_id=9668491, source=protobuf-bridge, error=NaN, value=0.0}] with reader 
> schema ... and writer schema ... as a JSON Object due to 
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: Character N is neither a decimal digit 
> number, decimal point, nor "e" notation exponential mark.
>  
> After some investigation in your repo, I found that it's because when the 
> AllowScientificNotation option of the JsonRecordSetWriter is set to 
> false(which is default, and that's why the record writer failed after the 
> upgrade), the value will be parse by BigDecimal class which does not support 
> "NaN". 
>  
> I'm not sure if this is the expected behaviour, but I think it's nice to let 
> you guys know that this would lead to existing services to fail because of 
> the change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to