[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17911634#comment-17911634
]
Daniel Stieglitz edited comment on NIFI-14140 at 1/9/25 7:57 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
How about RemoteProcessGroupResource on line 897
{code:java}
Set<RemoteProcessGroupEntity> remoteProcessGroupEntities = _revisions.stream()
.map(revision -> {
final RemoteProcessGroupEntity entity =
serviceFacade.updateRemoteProcessGroup(revision,
createDTOWithDesiredRunStatus(revision.getComponentId(),
remotePortRunStatusEntity));
populateRemainingRemoteProcessGroupEntityContent(entity);
return entity;
})
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
{code}
PMD is reporting remoteProcessGroupEntities is not used. I assume what is
happening in the mapping is needed but could this happen in a forEach instead
of a map so no Set would have to be created? For example
{code:java}
_revisions.forEach(revision -> {
final RemoteProcessGroupEntity entity =
serviceFacade.updateRemoteProcessGroup(revision,
createDTOWithDesiredRunStatus(revision.getComponentId(),
remotePortRunStatusEntity));
populateRemainingRemoteProcessGroupEntityContent(entity);
});{code}
was (Author: JIRAUSER294662):
How about RemoteProcessGroupResource on line 897
{code:java}
Set<RemoteProcessGroupEntity> remoteProcessGroupEntities = _revisions.stream()
.map(revision -> {
final RemoteProcessGroupEntity entity =
serviceFacade.updateRemoteProcessGroup(revision,
createDTOWithDesiredRunStatus(revision.getComponentId(),
remotePortRunStatusEntity));
populateRemainingRemoteProcessGroupEntityContent(entity);
return entity;
})
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
{code}
PMD is reporting remoteProcessGroupEntities is not used. I assume what is
happening in the mapping is needed but could this happen in a forEach instead
of a map so no Set would have to be created?
> Apply PMD's UnusedLocalVariable across the code base
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-14140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14140
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Daniel Stieglitz
> Assignee: Daniel Stieglitz
> Priority: Minor
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)