esecules commented on PR #10079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/10079#issuecomment-3058218620
> In general I see the need for performance improvement. My issue is we are
already going for one of the optional solutions without having decided which
one we want in the end. Because this change is not needed if we go with option
2. or option 3.
>
> Do we want this as a quick-fix?
@tpalfy I was hoping for a quick fix that could make it to the next release
that allows an "escape hatch" for the users like me ("there are dozens of us!")
who have a data flow with a large number of process groups.
Personally it's not too urgent for me since we have a workaround with our
API Gateway. It could be a problem for others.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
