[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18015274#comment-18015274
]
Daniel Stieglitz edited comment on NIFI-14863 at 8/20/25 9:44 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~exceptionfactory] Is it okay to have the displayNames which are identical to
the names of properties removed in class
{code:java}
org.apache.nifi.python.processor.RecordTransformProxy{code}
? I am not sure if removing them would affect anything on the Python side.
was (Author: JIRAUSER294662):
[~exceptionfactory] Is it okay to have the displayNames which are identical to
the names of properties removed in class
{code:java}
org.apache.nifi.python.processor.RecordTransformProxy{code}
? I was not sure if removing them would affect anything on the Python side.
> Align those components whose property names do not match the human-friendly
> display names.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-14863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14863
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Epic
> Reporter: Daniel Stieglitz
> Priority: Major
>
> Many components have historical property names that do not match the
> human-friendly display names. These names could be migrated, avoiding the
> unnecessary duplication. This is fairly simple, but requires attention to
> detail, and chunking the work into well-organized groups for easier review.
> This epic is based on one of the items on the current TODO list found
> [here|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Technical+Debt+TODO+list].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
