[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18021415#comment-18021415
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-14985:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 6ab2b15b29547eea840bafab9807989e15ea10f0 in nifi's branch 
refs/heads/main from Pierre Villard
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=6ab2b15b29 ]

NIFI-14985 Fixed Dynamic Property determination for filtering differences as 
environmental changes (#10326)

Signed-off-by: David Handermann <exceptionfact...@apache.org>

> Removed property should be considered as an environmental change
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-14985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14985
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Pierre Villard
>            Assignee: Pierre Villard
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Let's consider the scenario:
>  * I have a processor version X which is configured with properties A, B, C
>  * I have a versioned flow V that contains this processor version X
>  * Then I create a version Y of the processor where I now only have 
> properties A and B and I did implement the _removeProperty()_ call
> If I import the flow when only the processor version Y is available, the 
> versioned process group will show a local change with the property being 
> removed. We should not show this as a local change since it's an expected 
> modification of the flow with the call of removeProperty() (we should however 
> check that this is not a dynamic property).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to