[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15868844#comment-15868844
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3485:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user jjmeyer0 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1514

    NIFI-3485: Updated test to mock out use of InetAdress when looking up…

    … domain. There was an issue where unresolvable domains got routed to an 
ISP page. This should fix that issue.
    
    To test this I mocked out I did the following:
    
    Made the test fail by mocking InetAddress#getByName and having it throw and 
exception that wasn't a `UnknownHostException`:
    when(InetAddress.getByName("somenonexistentdomain.comm")).thenThrow(new 
Exception("asdf"));
    
    I then changed it to throw the expected `UnknownHostException`
    
when(InetAddress.getByName("somenonexistentdomain.comm")).thenThrow(UnknownHostException.class);
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jjmeyer0/nifi NIFI-3485

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1514.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1514
    
----
commit d82b6a2e78885737ee6b7c9e6435b002feacfcff
Author: JJ <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-02-16T00:05:28Z

    NIFI-3485: Updated test to mock out use of InetAdress when looking up 
domain. There was an issue where unresolvable domains got routed to an ISP 
page. This should fix that issue.

----


> GeoEnrich Test that Lookups Domain Will Fail if ISP Re-routes Unresolvable 
> Domains
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3485
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions, Tools and Build
>            Reporter: Josh Meyer
>            Assignee: Josh Meyer
>
> The following test will fail if unresolvable domains get routed to a 
> different page:
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/3dc7a160ce83a1e83edacc54941ac4d0f5fff718#diff-ec878376fc4a20b72842315cd4d11a57R256



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to