awelless opened a new pull request, #11320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/11320

   <!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more -->
   <!-- contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with 
-->
   <!-- this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. -->
   <!-- The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 
-->
   <!-- (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with -->
   <!-- the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at -->
   <!--     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   <!-- Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software -->
   <!-- distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, -->
   <!-- WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or 
implied. -->
   <!-- See the License for the specific language governing permissions and -->
   <!-- limitations under the License. -->
   
   # Summary
   
   [NIFI-16003](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-16003)
   
   When a prior legacy-checkpoint migration failed mid-flight (e.g. step 5 copy 
threw because DynamoDB's request router still cached the old table schema after 
recreation, see the ticket for more details), the migration table was left 
behind as the only surviving copy of the per-shard checkpoint state. On 
restart, `LegacyCheckpointMigrator.cleanupLingeringMigration` would 
unconditionally delete that table, silently losing all checkpoints and forcing 
every shard back to `INITIAL_STREAM_POSITION`.
   
   Re-run the copy from the migration table into the checkpoint table before 
deleting it. This is safe because any failure in the rename sequence propagates 
out of ensureCheckpointTableExists and prevents the processor from starting, so 
the checkpoint table cannot have advanced past the migration table's contents — 
the re-copy either restores lost state or re-puts identical rows.
   
   # Tracking
   
   Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.
   
   ### Issue Tracking
   
   - [Apache NiFi Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI) issue 
created
   
   ### Pull Request Tracking
   
   - Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as 
`NIFI-00000`
   - Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as 
such `NIFI-00000`
   - Pull request contains [commits 
signed](https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/signing-commits)
 with a registered key indicating `Verified` status
   
   ### Pull Request Formatting
   
   - Pull Request based on current revision of the `main` branch
   - Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes
   
   # Verification
   
   Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request 
creation.
   
   ### Build
   
   - [x] Build completed using `./mvnw clean install -P contrib-check`
     - [x] JDK 21
     - [ ] JDK 25
   
   ### Licensing
   
   - [ ] New dependencies are compatible with the [Apache License 
2.0](https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0) according to the [License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html)
   - [ ] New dependencies are documented in applicable `LICENSE` and `NOTICE` 
files
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [ ] Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to